Il 06/12/2016 09:20, Régis Haubourg ha scritto: > @Paolo, I think we are not yet in polishing step, some really low level > things still need to be broken and rebuilt. See > there: https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/issues
Yeas, as I wrote: > Could we set some of the issues [0] as blockers? > [0]https://github.com/qgis/qgis3.0_api/issues IMHO separating "nice to have" from crucial stuff will help us deciding where to channel efforts, and when to draw a line. Thanks. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
