Hi Andreas,
> So the drag and drop issue seems unrelated to Geopackage - right? as far as I remember there is a general regression about d&d + the same functionality always had issues with gpkg (among the other things). > About geopackage: if you can come up with a comprehensive list with > Geopackage problems I would be willing to find finances to fix these issues. > I would ask Even Rouault to have a look at these issues. I will do. > I personally have a strong, very strong urge to have a good alternative to > these stupid, ugly shapefiles. We really need to make sure that Geopackage > works well in QGIS/GDAL and FOSSGIS in general. Only then we can seriously > suggest geopackage as a Shapefile replacement. agree, a lot. > BTW: I also think that regressions in a LT bug fix release are really > undesired. We received quite a lot of funding recently to QGIS.ORG and I > think we should spend some of these on fixing the LT regression issues. I think that lately the very bad thing is that regression in between point releases of LTR started to surface. I strongly suggest that the paid bug fixing effort should be targeted to 1) regressions 2) issues that we know cause crash or data corruption in a replicable manner. -- G -- _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
