On 22 Dec 2016 00:29, "Neumann, Andreas" <[email protected]> wrote:
BTW: I also think that regressions in a LT bug fix release are really undesired. We received quite a lot of funding recently to QGIS.ORG and I think we should spend some of these on fixing the LT regression issues. Do you have examples of serious regressions in the LTS? My experience (based entirely on gut feeling and near daily reading of the bug tracker) is that there hasn't been any serious regressions so far in 2.14. We've had packaging issues due to the webkit mess, but this isn't really our fault and only affected debian users as far as I'm aware. Otherwise, we've had some non serious bugs introduced but only as a result of related fixes to somewhat fragile areas of the code. But that's just my experience, and I'm keen to hear if yours differs! Nyall
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
