Hey, Which major broken stuff has been left for years?
- Nathan On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 11:43 pm Giovanni Manghi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Nyall, Tim, > > > > I'd prefer to prioritise a High priority bug which affects 90% of > > users over a regression which affects 0.05% of users. Eg something > > like http://hub.qgis.org/issues/16001 is a regression (I suspect it's > > upstream though, that's why I closed it), but the conditions to > > experience it are so obscure that I wouldn't want to see this targeted > > over any high priority bugs! > > well, as you cite a case that is at one end of the spectrum we may > want to be fair and cite cases at the other end, like broken widely > used core functionalities left as such (for years in some case). > > Tim, you say "In an ideal world, the person who introduced the > regression should be the one that fixes it but we don't have the > leverage to enforce that.". > Why the project won't have the leverage to enforce such policy? seems > a fair one. > > cheers! > > -- G -- > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
