Hi Matthias, Thanks a lot for dealing with this!
Andreas On 2017-01-11 11:37, Matthias Kuhn wrote: > Hi, > > I have just received the confirmation from travis that they boosted our > build times to 90 minutes. > I think that should keep us alive for the foreseeable future. > > Please let me use this opportunity to highlight the excellent support > from their side! > > Matthias > > On 04/01/17 10:31, Matthias Kuhn wrote: Hi Andreas, Nyall > > I would also prefer this, I just sent them a mail and will get back to > you as soon as I get a response. > > Mid-term we will still need to launch a project to update the system and > get away from the pre-built dependencies in osgeo4travis to a system > that is easier to maintain collectively but I'm happy if we can wait > with this a bit. > > @Tom Chadwin: > agreed, that's a risk indeed > > Best regards > Matthias > > On 01/04/2017 08:21 AM, Neumann, Andreas wrote: Hi all, > > I agree with Nyall. We should try contracting the travis ci team and ask > them if we could switch to unlimited build time. Even if this means > paying a certain amount for the services (if it is a reasonable price). > > Matthias - could you please take a lead in contacting them? > > Thanks, > Andreas > > On 2017-01-03 23:40, Nyall Dawson wrote: > > On 4 January 2017 at 07:59, Matthias Kuhn <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi René-Luc, hi all, > > This is something I have been afraid of for a couple of weeks. > > Short story: our builds just grew too big and a full build is taking > more than 50 minutes to complete on the travis infrastructure. Argh... what a > pain! Still, I think in some ways this is a good > reflection of the exponential growth in QGIS unit tests since your > initial work introducing the CI infrastructure. I certainly would > never want to go back to the pre-CI days! > > Just wondering- is there any chance sending an email to the Travis > crew could get an extension to this build time? I can't see anything > on their publicised plans, but perhaps they have a cheaper unlimited > build time option available for open source projects? > > I'd like to see us exhaust these "easier" options first before > requiring someone to donate time into tweaking/changing the CI > infrastructure. > > Nyall > > What > keeps us alive at the moment is the persistent ccache so a full build > actually never happens. If the ccache gets lost, we will need some black > magic to get the builds started again (it's possible to slowly get the > cache warm but not straightforward). > > What we could possibly do: > > - Modularize the build: e.g. astyle could very well be moved to a > separate job along with other static checks like spelling. That would > even have the advantage of a faster feedback for these analyses. > But I'm not sure how much time we can actually get out of that. > > - Move dependencies into separate packages. We have some deps like > qspatialite that are built as part of QGIS which I think could be > installed as dependencies from a .deb. This will require quite a bit > of work: moving travis out of the container based infrastructure to > the sudo-enabled infrastructure, setting up a repo (e.g. ppa) with > all sort of dependencies including qt 5 etc. This would be an option > again since travis enabled caching also on sudo systems recently. > This will be a quite large task to do. > > - Move to another system (managed infrastructure or self-hosted, there > are a couple of services like circle ci, drone.io, jenkins, gitlab > ci ...). > This will be a quite large task to do with the risk that we run into > yet another timeout, other technical issue or run a self-hosted > infrastructure for which nobody really has the resources to maintain. > > Apart from this, there is also the dependency on some pre-compiled > libraries in the osgeo4a repository. Keeping these up to date is not > something we will want in the long term (I was hoping that travis would > ship a more recent distro than trusty but haven't seen many hints in > this direction yet). > > Bottomline: I don't think there's an easy fix but I think it's time to > start thinking about the future. > > Matthias > > On 01/02/2017 03:03 PM, René-Luc Dhont wrote: Hi Devs, > > I would like to merge a PR https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/3897 but > Travis cannot ccomplete the tests. > > Would it be simple to fix travis ? > > Regards, > René-Luc > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
