Hi Paolo, Are you referring to the quality of the upstream help?
My proposal offers to do both: * By default use the upstream help if quality is good enough * Override *where necessary* What about translation? Matthias On 01/13/2017 11:26 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Il 13/01/2017 11:11, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto: > >> What would also be nice if someone with experience and connections could >> check with saga, grass, etc. how collaboration could work, especially >> also w.r.t. to translation of algorithm documentation. > > IMHO the GRASS help is fine as it is, and should not be rewritten, just > made it available to the user. The current situation is fine, I think. > Main problems are with SAGA and our own algs. > All the best. > _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgisemail@example.com List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer