Are you referring to the quality of the upstream help?
My proposal offers to do both:
* By default use the upstream help if quality is good enough
* Override *where necessary*
What about translation?
On 01/13/2017 11:26 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 13/01/2017 11:11, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto:
>> What would also be nice if someone with experience and connections could
>> check with saga, grass, etc. how collaboration could work, especially
>> also w.r.t. to translation of algorithm documentation.
> IMHO the GRASS help is fine as it is, and should not be rewritten, just
> made it available to the user. The current situation is fine, I think.
> Main problems are with SAGA and our own algs.
> All the best.
Qgis-developer mailing list
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer