On 2 February 2017 at 00:18, Tim Sutton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks yes I agree that sounds a reasonable approach. What do others think of > my proposal to require peer review before merging PR's? I think it will help > prevent situations where code gets merged before people have had a good > chance to review it in future. >
I'm in favour - in theory this sounds like a good, safe move. I would say we trial it out for a period and see how it works in practice. Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
