Ola Alexandre, Il 07/02/2017 18:18, Alexandre Neto ha scritto:
> So, IMHO, after the release and branch a QGIS LTR version, we can delay > the documentation branching for a while to give time for a good > documentation release, but we can't do it for too long, to avoid the > situation mentioned above. > > Also, IMHO, after documentation LTR branching (e.g. 2.14), documenting > any feature introduced in an intermediate version (e.g. 2.16, 2.18) > should be done, if possible, taking into account changes make to it in > QGIS master (e.g. 2.99). seems fine to me - any objection? All the best, and thank you for raising the issue. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
