On 15 March 2017 at 10:10, Barry Rowlingson <b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk> wrote: > Yes, it wouldn't be a good idea for every plugin that wanted to do > some sort of remote control to implement its own server. Perhaps there > should be a server plugin that plugins can hook into at a given URL, > so they can attach a handler function to http://host:port/wherever
but you can design your plugin to be used by other plugins and with a "plugin" structure... e.g. a lot o people use Processings algs thanks of ther interface offered by the processing plugin. btw these are my 2c Luigi Pirelli ************************************************************************************************** * Boundless QGIS Support/Development: lpirelli AT boundlessgeo DOT com * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir * Mastering QGIS 2nd Edition: * https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/mastering-qgis-second-edition ************************************************************************************************** _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer