I can't agree more,  gitter added some more dispersion in channels, and
having a merge opportunity will help filling the communications gaps we
have now.
Régis

2017-03-31 12:20 GMT+02:00 Sandro Santilli <[email protected]>:

> I was happy to find a Matrix room for QGIS (#qgis:matrix.org)
> which is bridged to the Gitter chat room and wondering why such
> Matrix room isn't also bridged to the IRC channel on Freenode
> (irc://irc.freenode.net/#qgis). Was it a choice or was it just
> not done yet ?
>
> As I've done Matrix rooms plumbing for a few channels this morning
> (#osgeo:matrix.org, #osgeo-sac:matrix.org, #postgis:matrix.org,
> #geos:matrix.org) I've understood it takes a Matrix room admin
> and an IRC operator to complete the bridging. For QGIS these
> are Tim on the matrix side and Jurgen on the IRC side. Also,
> it takes a real-time synchronization because the request for
> authorization expires in 3 minutes or so, which might be the
> reason why the bridging was not completed yet.
>
> So this mail is to request bridging of IRC to matrix (which would
> automatically also mean bridging IRC and Gitter) and to suggest
> granting privileges to more people from the QGIS community to
> both the Freenode and Matrix channels, which would help doing
> these kind of things.
>
> Consider me available for help on both networks (strk on freenode;
> @strk:matrix.org on matrix), or find me on IRC if you need help
> with the bridge completion.
>
> May the QGIS chat community be merged again ! :)
>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> [email protected]
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to