I agree 100% on what Alex said. Rashad, instead of adding your user, can I completely move the ownership to you or to another account that is managed by the OTB team?
2017-05-17 11:18 GMT+02:00 Alexander Bruy <alexander.b...@gmail.com>: > Hi Rashad, > > 2017-05-16 11:46 GMT+03:00 Rashad Kanavath <mohammedrasha...@gmail.com>: >> okay. current version needs update of lot of xml files, change in version >> number, list of application inside the otb plugin sources. I want to avoid >> that. And I think both OTB and QGIS developers will agree on this. >> >> instead of xml files, otb can directly output those csv files which are read >> by processing core. > > I'm not against this, but IMHO such work should go for 3.0, as it requires > many changes in OTB provider. Pushing this changes in 2.18 is dangerous > (we already have broken SAGA support because of too fast switch to > SAGA 2.3.1) and may break OTB support in LTR version. > > I think OTB team should take ownership on OTB provider plugin (it is hosted > in the Victor's repository now) and start impelement new functionality. For > QGIS 2.18 better to leave OTB support as is, or maybe backport some > fixes and description files to have OTB 5.4. and 5.6. > > -- > Alexander Bruy > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer