Ok that's all fine. Was just tabling the idea. Doesn't really affect me was just an idea mainly.
Nathan On Mon, 22 May 2017, 11:34 PM Neumann, Andreas <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with most other responses. I would like to see QGIS server remain > in the main repo. One of the reasons of the 3Liz refactoring is to remove > redundant code from Server and rely more on the core parts of the QGIS API, > to be better compatible. > > Andreas > > On 2017-05-22 15:26, Giovanni Manghi wrote: > > At the moment I think it would be best for QGIS Server to live in it's own > repo mainly because it means the development process and cycle can be > different to desktop if that is needed. > > > > That's exactly what I would *not* like to see. > > > > completely agree with Alessandro. > > > cheers! > > -- G -- > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
