While chasing a regression issue [1] I'm finding the "Affected Version" field not useful in finding what's the version which introduced a regression.
When the bug was originally filed (7 months ago) the "Affected Version" field was set to "2.16.1", which I guess was the version tested by the reporter, who reported this was a regression in "2.16" (2.14 working fine), and the "Target Version" was set to "2.16". 4 months later the "Target Version" field value was removed by Jean-Gabriel JGH. Shortly after Giovanni set "Target Version" to "2.18" and changed "Affected Version" from "2.16.1" to "2.18.4", effectively loosing the information about the oldest known affected version. [1] https://issues.qgis.org/issues/15463 May I suggest we use "Affected Version" field to list the "oldest known affected version" ? The fact that 2.16 is not maintained anymore could still be encoded in the "Target Version" (ie: milestone). What do you think about that approach ? Or do you have better suggestions ? --strk; () Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer /\ https://strk.kbt.io/services.html _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
