On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:00:21AM +0000, Denis Rouzaud wrote: > Le jeu. 15 juin 2017 à 10:13, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> a écrit : > > > > So rather than a compile error, you should get an automated build of > > the missing files. > > > > Likewise, generated files should not be in the GIT repository (as they > > are not things you want to edit manually). > > > > Is the above achievable ? > > Yes this is totally achievable. That's the option 4, slightly modified.
So my vote goes to option 4 - inlined for easy of access: 4) cmake for both without sip in source - similar to above - is sipify stable enough? not sure. > I'm just not very keen on removing sip files from source at the moment, at > least until all files are sipified, but it should not be too long until > then. About the "is sipify stable enough?" question, you might have noticed my bug report: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/16710 It could maybe be useful to have a component for issues related to sipification, what do you think ? --strk; _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer