Right. I wasn't worried about breaking models per say, just wondering whether the select by expression alg will play as nicely with intermediary outputs.
On Jul 13, 2017 13:17, "Alexander Bruy" <[email protected]> wrote: > Also we already removed bunch of other algs, e.g. Zonal Statistics, > old basic statistics, etc > > 2017-07-13 9:16 GMT+03:00 Alexander Bruy <[email protected]>: > > Module will be broken anyway > > (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/95) > > so I see nothing bad here. > > > > 2017-07-13 9:13 GMT+03:00 Mathieu Pellerin <[email protected]>: > >> Would that negatively impact on models? Assuming here that the attribute > >> input was able to interact with model string outputs. > >> > >> On Jul 13, 2017 13:11, "Alexander Bruy" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> As part of the ongoing Processing upgrade and cleanup we should take > >>> the opportunity to get rid of duplicated algorithms. > >>> > >>> Now, when we have powerful "Select by expression" tool personally I > see no > >>> reasons to keep "Select by attribute" which now provides only limited > >>> susbset > >>> of selection options. Any objections to delete "Select by attribute"? > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Alexander Bruy > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> QGIS-Developer mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > > > > > -- > > Alexander Bruy > > > > -- > Alexander Bruy >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
