On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > Just after some opinions on whether or not the native c++ processing > algorithm implementations (qgsnativealgorithms.cpp/.h) should > ultimately reside in core or analysis. > > Up till 3.0 analysis has been a bit of a funny library, since it mixed > up the logic for the analysis methods with their ui interface > (requiring progress dialogs and the like). So it kind of sat above > both core and gui, but below app. > > That's all been cleaned up now for 3.0, so analysis no longer has any > use of gui methods. Now it could potentially sit just above the core > library, and be used in non-gui situations like qgis server and > qfield. Accordingly, I think it's the right place for these c++ > processing algorithms to ultimately sit. > > But I don't want to restrict ourselves by doing this... > > So, qfield and qgis server maintainers: would moving these > implementations to analysis prevent you from using them in future? Do > you have issues with linking in analysis to your applications? > > Nyall > Hi Nyall, thanks for this cleanup, as long as GUI is not required, I don't expect any problem in linking it from server in the future. -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
