On 24-10-17 00:33, Nyall Dawson wrote: > Hi all, > > Just wanted to raise discussion about what we should do regarding the > 100+ open PRs currently sitting in the request queue, especially with > regards to the looming freeze. > > I can see two options: > > 1. freeze = freeze, no exceptions. But then we run the risk of people > merging PRs and commits prematurely without full peer review just to > get them in for 3.0 (it becomes a rush of "quick merge in whatever > state because it's a cool feature!!). Or alternatively we may miss > open PRs which are important (crucial?) to have in place for 3.0 (e.g. > processing SAGA/GRASS providers, Nathan's settings migrations, etc). > > 2. Allow open PRs to be merged after freeze on a case-by-case basis, > up to a suitable cut-off date (when?).
Yep, my preference would be *2* too, in combination with further cleanup. But I also think we need to start working on stability. I try to use both version in daily testing/work, and QGIS3 is at this moment more crashing to end a session, then being stopped by me :-( So I think we really need to work/test before being able to release a stable version.... Regards, Richard Duivenvoorde _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
