+1 from me too! (I've been concerned by the release postpone quite some time, but having it 2 weeks or just before Christmas, won't be a huge change for organizations)
Le ven. 3 nov. 2017 à 12:08, Alexander Bruy <[email protected]> a écrit : > +1 from me too > > 2017-11-03 12:44 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]>: > > Hi > > > > On 11/03/2017 11:36 AM, Martin Dobias wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I agree with Régis. It would be useful to have the layouts instead of > the > >>> old composers in QGIS 3. It would be better than the other > alternatives, > >>> even if it would mean a further delay of the QGIS 3 release. > >> Agreed as well. The alternatives are really much, much inferior > >> solutions. Nyall's estimate that he would need two weeks to get > >> layouts replace old composer code is not that much extra time to ask > >> after having QGIS 3.0 in development for ~1.5 year. It would be a > >> shame if we missed the opportunity to get rid of the old composer code > >> before 3.0 -- especially after so many great cleanups in 3.0 API that > >> have been done. The print layouts is not just an ordinary feature - it > >> is a result of a hugely successful crowdfunding campaign and many > >> weeks of development - and something we all look forward to :-) > >> > >> The stability of the new codebase is reasonable concern to have, but > >> Nyall is well known for delivering high quality results, and we still > >> have some weeks for bug fixing before the release - and also > >> afterwards. > > > > Count me +1 on these statements by Martin and Régis > > > > > >> > >>> We just have to think about the consequences. Personally, I would > propose to > >>> delay the QGIS 3 release again a bit, e.g. release later in December, > just > >>> before Christmas - because I do think that the bug fixing period, as > it is > >>> scheduled now is too short. > >> That sounds sensible to me. Free copies of QGIS 3.0 as the Christmas > >> present for everyone :-) > > > > That sounds very sensible to me, I won't make yet another proposal to > > keep the original date for a "beta" release ;-) > > > > Matthias > > > > _______________________________________________ > > QGIS-Developer mailing list > > [email protected] > > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > -- > Alexander Bruy > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
