Hi Yves, I have all kind of strange behaviours. As said: in master I can only create one bookmark. And 'In Project' I cannot check.
But in 2.18.14 (only 2.18 I have) it is behaving strange too, looks like it is depending on if you opening an existing project or not??? - I CAN check the check-boxes if I load an existing project BUT the bookmark checked moves to the bottom then (sorting on??) - I can NOT check the checkbox when I create a new project, then load some data, save the project and add a bookmark. - some project end up with a 0 srid (and are not usable anymore after that) - after opening an existing project I can all at a sudden check the check-boxes again (from other projects?), but IF I check those, I actually delete them from my global bookmarks???? Apparently the 'In Project' means something like: save it in the project, BUT remove it from the global bookmarks? At least to me the behavior of all this is very counter-intuitive :-( 2.18, I do not care too much about it, but in Master it should work (and preferably work intuitive :-) )... Regards, Richard On 28-11-17 09:22, Yves Jacolin wrote: > Hi, > > I did a quick test in my 2.18.11 instance of QGIS: > > * open an existing project > > * zoom somewhere and add a new bookmark, check "in project" checkbox > > * close the project, open a blank new project, do something > > * open again the previous project and test the spatial bookmark > > All worked as expected. I zoomed in the bookmark location and the "in > project" bookmark disappear in a new project. > > Y. > > > Le 28/11/2017 à 09:17, Richard Duivenvoorde a écrit : >> Hi devs, >> >> just a head up that currently (with me) the Spatial Bookmarks are >> severely broken, both in master and 2.18. >> >> Stuff which should have been introduced: >> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/2661 >> do not work with me here locally. >> >> Not even the basic adding of one bookmark. >> >> Other issues: >> https://issues.qgis.org/projects/qgis/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&issues=1&q=bookmark >> >> Can people confirm? >> >> Though not that important in my view, I do not think we should ship >> current implementation in a 3.0 >> >> Regards, >> >> Richard Duivenvoorde >> _______________________________________________ >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
