2017-12-18 9:39 GMT+01:00 Régis Haubourg <[email protected]>:

> - we HAD to use SQLITE and not spatialite, even though we wanted to use a
> spatially enabled db. It turned out that init time to create a spatialite
> with current provider was way too long, and having a default empty DB
> storing more than 4Mo of SRS, functions and various metadata was not a good
> idea for QGIS project file. Can anyone give us imputs if GPKG, relying on
> spatialite implementation could suffer from the same drawbacks?
>
>
About the 4 Mo of SRS in the DB, check this discussion on Twitter last week
with Luigi:
https://twitter.com/Ginetto/status/941327701570392064
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to