Am 02.01.2018, 23:39 Uhr, schrieb Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com>:
I think on balance I prefer option #2 as it will get more people using
QGIS 3 - we must just be careful to tell people that it is ‘next-gen’
and that the LTR is still 2.18….
Ok, let me re-word option 2 as:
"2. Carefully manage release expectations, with detailed explanations
of known issues and regressions in the release notes. Stress in press
releases/release notes that 3.0 is a new major release and that the
QGIS team do not consider it a suitable replacement for the current
stable LTR release, and that it is highly recommended that
organisations do not replace their existing QGIS 2.x installations
before careful in-house testing and evaluation of its suitability for
their workplace. The next stable LTR QGIS release will be QGIS 3.2."
Nyall
<voicefromthebackground>
I like all your elaborated wordings, but couldn't you just brand 3.0 with
a huge red BETA mark, and nearly everyone should know what this means:
Evaluation: Yes!, Production: Maybe, on yout own risk.
</voicefromthebackground>
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
--
Bernd Vogelgesang
Siedlerstraße 2
91083 Baiersdorf/Igelsdorf
Tel: 09133-825374
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
