On 01/12/2018 03:31 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote: > > Hi, > > I think the biggest question: who does all the work to migrate from > Redmine to Github while not loosing all our history? >
I started working on it some time ago and thought it looked quite promising. I stopped the work because of lack of conviction that there's a perspective for this. > And I don't think that Redmine is so bad usability wise. I agree, the > UI is not as sexy as Github, but it does its job well. It is much more > powerful for finding and filtering. The issues we had with the slow > performance was fixed when moving to a new Machine at Hetzner. The > main argument for github is in my opinion not ease of use - but the > integration with the code base - that is definitely a strength of > github issue reporting. Agreed, it's better than before. Because no more mantra, usable performance. On the other hand I don't prefer it's search and filtering options. > To undermine that github is not easy to use for non-dev users: last > Wednesday at the Swiss QGIS user meeting I was in the meeting for > QWC2. Users had no idea at all how Github works and could be used for > issue reporting. One had to explain it to them and teach them how to > use it. To assume that using github is self-explanatory for non-tech > users is a wrong assumption. > I wouldn't claim that for either of the two platforms. There's a learning curve for both. Myself, I happen to meanwhile embrace markdown but struggle with the redmine syntax. Not because it's worse, just because I am too lazy to learn another one. Matthias _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer