Hello Tisham,

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Tisham Dhar <tisham.d...@aerometrex.com.au>
wrote:

> Perhaps the plugin should provide an OTB binaries install mechanism once
> it runs and inspects the platform it is on.
>

Yes. This is my current proposal to otb provider. And the code will be less
and simpler than grass, saga etc..
But unless I finish coding part, It's not easy to have a discussion as
everyone refers to old version all the time.



>
> *From:* Rashad Kanavath [mailto:mohammedrasha...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 31, 2018 7:19 PM
>
> *To:* Tisham Dhar <tisham.d...@aerometrex.com.au>
> *Cc:* qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [QGIS-Developer] update of otb plugin for QGIS
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:05 AM, Tisham Dhar <
> tisham.d...@aerometrex.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Rashad,
>
>
>
> I meant pre-built OTB binaries rather than plugin binaries. I believe QGIS
> builds on more platforms than OTB does.
>
>
>
> plugin code is in python. so nothing much to worry on binaries part and
> they depend on qgis processing code.
>
> QGIS had removed otb plugin from processing and kept others. So there is
> another stuff to work on user side and developer side.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tisham.
>
>
>
> *From:* Rashad Kanavath [mailto:mohammedrasha...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 30, 2018 7:45 PM
> *To:* Tisham Dhar <tisham.d...@aerometrex.com.au>
> *Cc:* qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> *Subject:* Re: [QGIS-Developer] update of otb plugin for QGIS
>
>
>
>
>
> Hell Tisham,
>
>
>
> Can you explain the part of binaries issue?
>
>
>
> The documentation of build from source is already there for OTB. The new
> module which if merged into Modules/Wrappers/QGIS will be like any other
> otb module.
>
> Since there are no external dependencies, this could be enabled by
> default. So need to specific documentation to build it is not required.
>
>
>
> But once the coding work is done, there will be another (RFC) and in that
> i will include the usage, builds options etc..
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:10 AM, Tisham Dhar <
> tisham.d...@aerometrex.com.au> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I am an avid supporter to OTB and would love to see the plugin brought
> more in line with latest developments in OTB. The binaries issue will
> always exist and I believe OTB should support the same ones for which Qgis
> binaries are available already. The other platforms should have a clear
> build from source documentation. These should be listed in the RFC.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tisham Dhar
>
> Research Engineer
>
> Aerometrex PTY LTD
>
> 59 King William St.
>
> Kent Town SA 5067
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=59+King+William+St.%0D+%0D+Kent+Town+SA+5067%0D+Australia&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> Australia
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=59+King+William+St.%0D+%0D+Kent+Town+SA+5067%0D+Australia&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>    Rashad
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>    Rashad
>



-- 
Regards,
   Rashad
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to