I agree. Adding sphinx anchors should be enough. Unless there are algorithms from different providers usinf the same identifier, because in sphinx we cannot have duplicated anchor's names.
Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 19/02/2018 às 22:40: > On 19 February 2018 at 18:09, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> > wrote: > > Il 18/02/2018 22:48, Tim Sutton ha scritto: > >> Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a > >> summary of the current status list this! > > > > it wuld be nice if the small but annoying issue about modules with names > > with spaces would be solved; Nyall, could the same approach you used for > > link names also be used for anchors? > > I don't think this is a good idea - it means we have code in master > which will need updating if the help files are edited and the > algorithm headings tweaked. That'll get quite messy when different > versions/branches are involved (both on the qgis and documentation > side). > > I'd rather a fix on the documentation side which uses the invisible > link anchor matching the algorithm id - which is fixed and guaranteed > not to change. Weren't earlier experiments for this approach > successful? > > Nyall > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexandre Neto --------------------- @AlexNetoGeo http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer