I agree. Adding sphinx anchors should be enough. Unless there are
algorithms from different providers usinf the same identifier, because in
sphinx we cannot have duplicated anchor's names.

Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 19/02/2018
às 22:40:

> On 19 February 2018 at 18:09, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it>
> wrote:
> > Il 18/02/2018 22:48, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> >> Thanks so much for the summary Matteo, it is really nice to see a
> >> summary of the current status list this!
> >
> > it wuld be nice if the small but annoying issue about modules with names
> > with spaces would be solved; Nyall, could the same approach you used for
> > link names also be used for anchors?
>
> I don't think this is a good idea - it means we have code in master
> which will need updating if the help files are edited and the
> algorithm headings tweaked. That'll get quite messy when different
> versions/branches are involved (both on the qgis and documentation
> side).
>
> I'd rather a fix on the documentation side which uses the invisible
> link anchor matching the algorithm id - which is fixed and guaranteed
> not to change. Weren't earlier experiments for this approach
> successful?
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-- 
Alexandre Neto
---------------------
@AlexNetoGeo
http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
http://gisunchained.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to