Hi all, > I think we need to put this conversation at least in the devs list, not > everybody is in this community list, so we probably end up talking to > ourselves (which may still happen, since Docs aren't sexy). > > I don't think we will be able to do the documentation only with volunteers. > We will need to professionalize it. We need to pay people to write > documentation, and even to review it. > > Unfortunately, even having money to spend, it seems difficult to get people > that are free to do it... > > It's very frustrating to write lots of documentation, and then get stuck by > the lack of reviews. I know Harrissou is in that position. I would suggest > that, if after a period of time, the PR has no reviews at all, its owner is > free to merge it. I know it's not ideal but is better than having outdated > documentation while someones updates are in standby forever. > > BTW, it's on my TODO list to update the documentation video, focusing on > the github approach. ut I don't know when I will have time for that.
I'm still committed to contribute to documentation, as already said in the past weeks (before Funchal) I just struggled mightily to finish some previous commitment nevertheless my contributions should start to appear really soon. cheers -- G -- _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
