Absolutely. It was the right move to not add that as part of backported
browser panel fixes for emergency 3.4.1, but it should ultimately be in the
LTR to fix a feature gone missing regression.



On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, 6:54 AM Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi list,
>
> I'm looking for thoughts on whether it's suitable for backporting
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/17447e4b from 3.6 to 3.4.2.
>
> The rationale here is that the loss of layer preview functionality is
> a functional regression from 2.18 (due to us completely dropping the
> standalone browser application in 3.0). The changes are quite small
> and self-contained (a lot of that commit has already been backported
> via other bugfixes).
>
> I've had one customer already question how they can preview layers in
> 3.x as a result.
>
> Is this suitable for a backport?
>
> Nyall
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to