Absolutely. It was the right move to not add that as part of backported browser panel fixes for emergency 3.4.1, but it should ultimately be in the LTR to fix a feature gone missing regression.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, 6:54 AM Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi list, > > I'm looking for thoughts on whether it's suitable for backporting > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/17447e4b from 3.6 to 3.4.2. > > The rationale here is that the loss of layer preview functionality is > a functional regression from 2.18 (due to us completely dropping the > standalone browser application in 3.0). The changes are quite small > and self-contained (a lot of that commit has already been backported > via other bugfixes). > > I've had one customer already question how they can preview layers in > 3.x as a result. > > Is this suitable for a backport? > > Nyall > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer