Hi, I wish to point to couple of issues regarding WFS for latest QGIS Server that I think need to be fixed before it can be ready for production (next LTR):
1. DescribeFeatureType not following TYPENAME parameter https://issues.qgis.org/issues/20198 2. Can't reset numeric field using WFS Update https://issues.qgis.org/issues/20961 3. WFS issue using the EXP_FILTER parameter https://issues.qgis.org/issues/20927 best regards, Uroš http://level2.si V V pet., 28. dec. 2018 ob 18:12 je oseba Paolo Cavallini < [email protected]> napisala: > Hi Régis, > > On 28/12/18 17:48, Régis Haubourg wrote: > > Hi, > > > > sorry to be late. Can anyone point me to the issues of QGIS server > > making you say it is not ready for production? > > > > OGC tests are running every night and work fine. I see only one issue > > with high priority affecting QGIS > 3.0 versions. > > In fact I see only 61 issues: > https://issues.qgis.org/projects/qgis/issues?category_id=49 > of which only 20 apply to 3.*. Régis, could you please have a look and > close the obsolete ones (there are even 6 pre 2.18)? Do you see any > blocker on the list? > So apparently it is in a good shape. The main issue therefore moves to > the clients: which ones are ready for QGIS 3? What is the expected > release time for a Q3-savy version? It would be great if at least the > most popular ones would be rady by the 2.18 EOL. > All the best. > -- > Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu > QGIS.ORG Chair: > http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/ > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
