Yes - it is actually an example where the feature is already quite documented. Just not in the manual.

It is one of the better cases, when it comes to documentation.

Andreas

Am 16.01.19 um 16:07 schrieb Marco Bernasocchi:

Well to be fair, in this (and many) other cases, the "Naughty Dev" provided an amazingly well written description of the feature. That can just be copy pasted to the docs.

But yes, I think minimal docs, or maybe a changelog entry or a link to a blogpost would be good

Cheers

Marco


On 16.01.19 14:39, Alexandre Neto wrote:
+1

No more "the naughty developer didn't provide a description" messages, please.

Best regards,

Alexandre Neto

Paolo Cavallini <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu no dia quarta, 16/01/2019 às 09:02:

    Totally agreed:
    * pushing at least a minimal documentation has to be a
    requirement, just
    like unit tests
    * an automatic system is far preferable to a manual one.
    Topic added to the TODO for the HF:
    
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/22nd-Developer-Meeting-in-A-Coru%C3%B1a,-Spain
    Thanks.

    On 16/01/19 09:14, Andreas Neumann wrote:
    > Hi Richard,
    >
    > It is something to consider - I agree that we have a
    documentation crisis.
    >
    > On the other hand - I never see any QGIS user
    reading/consulting that
    > manual we provide (because it is hard to read a manual) -
    that's why I
    > sometimes - if a question from a user about feature x is raised - I
    > don't answer directly but point to the chapter in the manual -
    just to
    > show users, that they should first read that manual, then
    Google and
    > consult stack exchange and then only ask if the other information
    > sources don't help. Or attend a course ...
    >
    > Perhaps there are also other forms to consider besides the
    manual to
    > reveal hidden features?
    >
    > The visual changelog is a good resource to find out about new
    and hidden
    > features - but even that is often only a title and no text and
    screenshot.
    >
    > Let's discuss it in A Coruna at the meeting. Perhaps we should
    try your
    > proposal, even if I expect some resistance from some
    devs/customers.
    >
    > Greetings,
    > Andreas
    >
    > Am 16.01.19 um 08:42 schrieb Richard Duivenvoorde:
    >> Hi Devs,
    >>
    >> As I see we are in a "Documentation crisis" and seeing the
    comment below
    >> in a discussion (please do not take this personal!!!):
    >>
    >> """
    >> No. From my side it's no documentation PR planned at the
    moment. Feel
    >> free to do something and to take the stuff from my blogpost.
    >> """
    >>
    >> I think our project has to do something. Even throwing money
    at people
    >> (we did as PSC!) does not help...
    >>
    >> I'm really afraid QGIS will end up with a lot of HIDDEN
    features and
    >> possibilities. A lot of it's functionality is hiding because
    it isn't
    >> mentioned in the QGIS docs or blogs (maybe in other (company)
    blogs),
    >> but only in the code ...
    >>
    >> I do not want to be a PITA, but can we maybe add a mandatory
    requirement
    >> for a pull request that in case of a new feature the dev adds some
    >> mandatory Text and Images about the feature IN the PR?
    >>
    >> He/she can also ask a community member to do that by giving some
    >> interview.
    >>
    >> It is really NO fun for doc writers to find a [FEATURE] issue
    in the doc
    >> writing issues list. He/she has to start guessing how it was
    >> implemented, try it out, or google for some blogpost or start
    talking to
    >> the dev etcetc. Really NO fun if you want to work on the
    documenation
    >> because it takes so much time!
    >>
    >> I think implementing developer is just the best person to
    write one or
    >> two paragraphs (and add some images, hey he has also tested during
    >> coding isn't it?).
    >> In this way doc writing could then be just 'copy and paste'
    the text, do
    >> some grammar fixes and add images from the PR of the dev in
    the docs.
    >>
    >> I know a project like MapProxy handles it's PR's even more
    rigid: if
    >> Documentation is not part of the code PR, it is just nog
    pulled. It is
    >> easier there because they have text only docs IN the src tree;
    that is
    >> why I propose to do only text + images.
    >>
    >> I know this is an old idea, but seeing one dev asking about
    already
    >> implemented features to another dev was the drop...
    >> And I'm aware that you cannot prevent this anyway.... as
    nobody likes to
    >> RTFM :-)
    >>
    >> Regards,
    >>
    >> Richard Duivenvoorde
    >>
    >>
    >> -------- Forwarded Message --------
    >> Subject:     Re: [qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals] Translation
    of .qgs
    >> project files (#90)
    >> Date:     Tue, 15 Jan 2019 12:28:40 -0800
    >>
    >> ...
    >>
    >> No. From my side it's no documentation PR planned at the
    moment. Feel
    >> free to do something and to take the stuff from my blogpost.
    >>
    >> —
    >> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
    >> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
    >>
    
<https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/90#issuecomment-454539249>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> QGIS-Developer mailing list
    >> [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
    >> Unsubscribe:
    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
    > _______________________________________________
    > QGIS-Developer mailing list
    > [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
    > Unsubscribe:
    https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu <http://www.faunalia.eu>
    QGIS.ORG <http://QGIS.ORG> Chair:
    http://planet.qgis.org/planet/user/28/tag/qgis%20board/
    _______________________________________________
    QGIS-Developer mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
    Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

--
Alexandre Neto
---------------------
@AlexNetoGeo
http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
http://gisunchained.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe:https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
--
Marco Bernasocchi
QGIS.org Co-chair
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
+41 (0)79 467 24 70 <tel:+41794672470>

OPENGIS.ch Logo <https://www.opengis.ch>

_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to