Hi S., This is a valid issue that also bothers me for a long time (and I think is not coherent with the LTR status). And Jürgen Fischer recently pushed a PR that gives me some hope: see https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/9331 (basically, they are commands that help to backport transifex translations to elder releases). I quickly gave it a try but the result did not satisfy me and wanted to do more tests before reporting anything and bothering Jürgen with beginner's problem. If you want to give it a try... And maybe, instead of running that only for german, we could run it for all the languages.
I also opened https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/issues/592 few weeks ago, asking for a place where we could explain how LTR can be translated more than only the few weeks preceeding its .0 release. Regards, Harrissou Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 15:50, skampus <[email protected]> a écrit : > Dear all, the experience just ended of the first LTR version of QGIS leads > me > to make some considerations regarding the management of translations. > Many QGIS users are users who work in companies and public administrations; > these users cannot freely choose on which version to operate and therefore > they will use the LTR version even beyond its end of life. > > So the problem of harmonizing translations between the LTR version and the > master version is a very important aspect. > > As you know, the sources of the GUI and documentation relating to the > master > version are made available through the transifex platform. When the LTR > version is released, transifex continues to feed only the master version > and > therefore untranslated or worse badly translated strings can no longer be > treated with transifex. > > I ask how to resolve this situation. > for example, would it be possible to open a transifex instance ONLY for > 3.4.x ltr? people translate and, as for the master, at every release of the > ltr, the translation files are automatically taken from transifex "ltr". > I know that it is possible to translate with qtlinguist and then to do a > pull request for .qm language file, but in this way it is not possible to > translate all together with problems for merging different version andd so > on. > > what is your opinion? > > thank you in advance > > s. > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
