On 6/17/19 12:16 PM, Martin Dobias wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:11 PM Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]> wrote:
Wouldn't connection pooling be such a change. That certainly was
introduced after.
Pooling was introduced to deal with multi-threaded rendering and
should not affect that. There always was a connection that was kept
alive while layer(s) using that connection existed.
Interesting.
I still can't see any good explanation for the overhead detected 10
years ago, do you have an idea what this could be caused by?
I just can't imagine that an enterprise level database like postgres
would suffer from such an issue on the security side.
Cheers Matthias
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
