I should also say that this person only contacted me about adding a
feature, but never suggested making code modifications and then doing a
pull request.

I don't think it is a good policy to take an existing plugin, add a
feature, and release it as a new plugin unless the original plugin has been
abandoned.

I await your guidance on this matter.

Thanks,

Calvin

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:17 AM C Hamilton <adenacult...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd had the request to do this color hash for POI Exporter, but didn't get
> around to it so tnguessan released his own version. I think ideally it
> would have been better for tnguessan to have made the modifications to POI
> Exporter then do a pull request. I don't mind if he wants to take over this
> project, but we now have two POI Exporters. Should mine be deprecated?
> Would it be better for tnguessan to take over the 'POI Exporter' name?
> Would it be better to just keep the POI Exporter and have a pull request
> done? I could make him a part of the POI Exporter team.
>
> I really don't want to see two plugins that are diverging but basically
> doing the same thing. The plugin repo really only needs one. What is the
> best approach?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Calvin
>
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to