Hi Matthias, > One the first principles of every of our developers is to try to avoid > regressions. Whenever a QGIS developer writes code or reviews code, > there is this process in the back of the head going on thinking "could > this cause side effects?". Most of the times we are quite efficient in > detecting side effects and if in doubt running some tests (manually or > by adding unit tests) to check and adjust if required. This is what > makes QGIS a rock solid piece of software (are you in doubt? Take QGIS > 2.0 and QGIS 3.4 and perform some common GIS tasks). It's pretty awesome > actually!
a good comparison is also Processing frawoek in 2.x and 3.x, steps made are impressive. > At the same time, let's not obstruct our view too much by outliers. In > my opinion we are doing very well with what we have available and are > overall heading in a good direction! yes we are doing well QGIS :) I just would have raised a topic but I understand that it is super easy to such a delicate topic to be misinterpreted. > > Let's rock on and make QGIS even better :) Matteo _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer