Excuse me... Do I see correctly there was a switch from Proj5 to Proj6 between 3.10.0-1 and 3.10.0-2 ?
Two weeks before 3.10.0 we entered that painful hard freeze so we couldn't revert known regressions (except those introduced after the feature freeze) and had to release a buggy 3.10.0. Later a few other regressions were found (including at least one severe: the broken PostGIS in the Browser), so I assumed 3.10.1 would be the first "stable" 3.10.x (at least free from known regressions). And now I see a very risky change was introduced between two builds of the same release? Please correct me if I'm wrong, as I'd like to avoid a wrongful overinterpretation. Borys Dnia piątek, 22 listopada 2019 13:47:19 CET andreaerdna pisze: > Nyall Dawson wrote > > > I'm trying to get to the bottom of this (serious) issue in the Proj 6 > > based builds (which will be 3.10.1 for Windows users): > > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/30569 > > It seems there are other related bug reports: > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/32795 > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/32919 > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/32973 > > Best regards. > > Andrea Giudiceandrea > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-Developer-f4099106.html > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
