On samedi 23 novembre 2019 17:44:15 CET Jürgen E. Fischer wrote: > Hi Even, > > On Sat, 23. Nov 2019 at 17:36:52 +0100, Even Rouault wrote: > > But for the future, I can imagine we could have: > > qgis3_10 depending on gdal3 (or possibly even gdal3_0 ?) and proj6 and > > qt_whatever_we_use_currently > > And qgis3_12 could decide to upgrade one of its dependencies without > > impacting qgis3_10. > > Yes, that's the route I might have followed if 3.4 didn't (claim to) support > PROJ 6.
Actually, I *think* that QGIS 3.4 + GDAL 2.4 + PROJ 6 would probably work OK, because QGIS 3.4 would still use the legacy proj_api.h. The issue was more related to the upgrade to GDAL 3 changing how PROJ.4 strings are exported, and thus in practice requiring QGIS to be updated to use the new proj.h 6 API. -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
