On 2/5/20 11:33 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 20:29, Tim Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
On 4 Feb 2020, at 23:57, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote:
Is it enough to just grab the items labelled ‘Feature’ - we are planning to
automatically create entries from the changelog as part of the QGIS funded
improvements we are doing
In my experience... no. Some of us naughty developers don't always use
this tag :(
Now about we add a ‘Changelog’ tag that we can just go and add to each PR
(either at the time of making it or retrosopectively) and we can just go
through the PR queue and scan for those? Other options I guess is to strongly
encourage people to use a relevant tag when they submit their PR.
Definitely. Like you've pointed out, it could be done retrospectively,
and added also by others.
What are the guidelines for using [feature] in the future? I think it
acted as a combination of [needs docs], [changelog] and [look, this is
cool] in the past. If the first two are about to be solved by more
precise labels, do we keep it for the third one or are there other
compelling reasons?
Matthias
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
