On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 10:48, William Kyngesburye <[email protected]> wrote:
> If it's just a buggy backport bot, then that's bad timing on my part, after > all my dwindling spare time it took me to get caught up on my Mac build, I > get this. It is. The bot got seriously crippled by an upstream change, and now it's a coin toss on the results you'll get. My advice - just do the backports by hand. That's what I do. Nyall > > ... pardon the venting there. I hope someone can help out. > > ----- > William Kyngesburye > <[email protected]> > <http://www.kyngchaos.com> > > Don't Panic > > >> On Mar 3, 2020, at 9:02 AM, William Kyngesburye <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > > Hmm, yes still old name. But the original PR succeeds. Shouldn't the > > backport bot use what's in the PR that defines the fork? > > > > ----- > > William Kyngesburye > > <[email protected]> > > <http://www.kyngchaos.com> > > > > Don't Panic > > > >>> On Mar 3, 2020, at 8:15 AM, Etienne Trimaille > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> You should rename your fork. You are still using the old name > >> "Quantum-GIS" and not QGIS ? > > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
