Hi,

I think that this is a great Idea! The way I experience it is, that there are large fields of geospatial analysis which (currently) can only be worked on using third party providers in QGIS (eg. cost distance analysis or raster analysis in general). Many of those workflows turn out to be not very stable (at least thats the case for me).

I would like to furtherĀ  work on the collection of native QGIS processing algorithms and knowing which algorithms are used most frequently would make it easier to focus the development of new algorithms. I'm already very interested in the comparison/test-results you are going to post!

Best,
Clemens

_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to