Hi Andreas,
Interesting.
Behind the scenes, GeoSeer one-way hashes the GetCapabilities documents
and that hash is used as the document key. Identical GetCapabilities
documents therefore get the same key and thus only appear once in the
final index. But one single character different in the entire document
and it's a completely different hash.
There's also de-duplication at the endpoint, service, and dataset levels
using a similar mechanism. GeoSeer also de-duplicates across services.
I.e. if something is served from the same place as both WMS and WFS, we
glue them together.
The problem with using DNS is that you get organisations the size of
NOAA/USGS and they have deployments across various subdomains that are
doing different (but similar) things. You also get a kind of opposite -
a single domain belonging to a geospatial "cloud" hosting provider that
has lots of layers that have the same names and similar metadata because
all their local-government customers are sharing their own
fire-stations/roads etc.
There are all manner of ways in which server admins and data custodians
make this more complicated than it seems. :-)
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 2020-06-09 12:25, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for sharing this information. I don't know anything better.
While looking at some services that I know personally, I also found
out that others services are listed twice, because a machine might
have a DNS alias. That is also something to consider - perhaps sort
out machines that have identical GetCapabilities responses and just
the DNS name varies.
I agree, the numbers probably wouldn't change significantly.
Thanks and greetings,
Andreas
On 2020-06-09 13:14, Jonathan Moules wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Sure, happy to share.
There's a little on the About page: https://www.geoseer.net/about.php
and then scattered around blog posts (the ones with the "GeoSeer" tag
are probably best for that: https://www.geoseer.net/blog/?t=GeoSeer
), but put simply - We scrape a lot of different sources and metadata
catalogs and get the services from them. Then we request not only the
GetCapabilities that was declared, but also make educated guesses as
to what else might be on the box and request those too.
It's not perfect, but to the best of my knowledge it's by far the
largest such index in the world, and more importantly, it's
*current*. Everything in there responded with a valid GetCapabilities
document with at least one meaningful named dataset when it was last
scraped within the last few weeks.
Pertaining to your given services, GeoSeer has:
http://geoweb.so.ch/wms/sogis_natgef.wms? and a few others on that
sub-domain, as well as some on the subdomain:
http://www.sogis1.so.ch/cgi-bin/sogis/sogis_natgef.wms? - both are
now defunct I see which is why they're not in the database.
Thanks for the URL, I've added it for scraping.
So I wonder how many other QGIS server installations may not be in
your database?
Alas that's a "unknown unknown"; there's no way to know (I can't
think of a way to find out anyway; suggestions welcome). However the
vast majority of the time when I come across a new service manually
(i.e. from following various mailing lists like this), it turns out
it's already in the index, so I think it's reasonably comprehensive
at this point.
While missing servers may change the absolute number of QGIS
Installations, they're very unlikely to change the proportions. For a
sample-size this large I'd expect the proportions to remain largely
the same, certainly for deployments.
Hope that's of interest and answers the question,
Cheers,
Jonathan
On 2020-06-09 10:45, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Can you share with us how you harvest your information on available
public OGC services? You probably have that information published
somewhere - so if you could point me towards this URL, it would help.
I noticed that all of the services of our province (my employer)
can't be found, as an example.
Here is the start point:
https://so.ch/verwaltung/bau-und-justizdepartement/amt-fuer-geoinformation/geoportal/geodienste/wms-web-map-service/
and the GetCapabilities link:
https://geo.so.ch/api/wms?SERVICE=WMS&REQUEST=GetCapabilities&VERSION=1.3.0
So I wonder how many other QGIS server installations may not be in
your database? Of course I know you don't claim full coverage, but
it would still be good to know how you harvest your data.
Thanks for clarifying and greetings,
Andreas
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer