I'm also not convinced about the need for a new logo.
Like Raymond suggested I think we should use the existing logo and add
some text to it.
But the website, docs, examples, etc. should be improved as envisaged by
the QEPs/Grant proposals.
Greetings,
Andreas
On 2020-07-07 13:56, Raymond Nijssen wrote:
Indeed, marketing it as "one of the QGIS products' could be a good plan.
Now, our website says:
QGIS - The Leading Open Source Desktop GIS
Also, the download buttons at the landing page point to QGIS Desktop only.
Not sure about the need for a new logo though. New logos can take forever! :) What about writing
"desktop" and "server" next to or below the existing logo?
(similar to this:
https://qgis.org/en/_static/images/trademark.png?t=23feb2018
)
Regards,
Raymond
On 07-07-2020 00:29, Jorge Gustavo Rocha wrote: Hi all,
A dedicated logo and a dedicated landing page would be great (we could
use server.qgis.org for example). Part of QGIS Server "identity" problem
is because people think it as some QGIS additional feature. Not as
something that can be deployed in a headless server, independently of
QGIS. In fact, QGIS and QGIS Server share the same code base, but from a
functional point of view, they are different applications, for different
purposes. As developers, we put all the code in the same repo, but as
marketeers, we should sell two different products :-)
People looking for "map servers" should go there. Developers/sysops
should be able to deploy new QGIS Server instances from there.
Thank you Alexandre for volunteer. Julien, as far as I understood, will
lead this QEP implementation. Thank you both.
Regards,
Jorge
On 06/07/20 21:55, Alexandre Neto wrote: Hi all,
I agree the QGIS server deserves its own "document" in QGIS docs.
I Wouldn't mind assisting with that. Always a good opportunity to learn
more about it.
Best regards,
Alexandre
A segunda, 6/07/2020, 15:36, Julien Cabieces
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
escreveu:
Hi,
Hi,
During our recent meeting about QGIS Server it was pointed out that
QGIS Server does not have all the visibility that it deserves.
One of the possible actions is to move the server documentation to its
own independent chapter.
+1
The server documentation is now mainly mainly buried deep under
https://docs.qgis.org/3.10/en/docs/user_manual/working_with_ogc/server/index.html
A few other resources are in:
the training manual:
https://docs.qgis.org/3.10/en/docs/training_manual/qgis_server/index.html
and
https://docs.qgis.org/3.10/en/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/server.html
I was wondering this activity a could be performed as a part of the
paid/funded activity
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/184
Yes, I believe it should. We'll do it while we realize the QEP.
Kind regards
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
J. Gustavo
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
[email protected]
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
