On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 10:17 AM Richard Duivenvoorde <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, I hit that too. thanks for bringing this up! > > Another idea: as the docker is actually more or less 'static' (??? or is is > pushed to hub on every build ???), can we (or Travis) not 'cache' it? As in" > place it somewhere so it can be 'created/started' fresh any time, but not > 'fetched' upon every build? > Or does this loose the whole purpose of this... > Caching could be: put the image on some webserver of somebody with > 'unlimited' bandwidth (like some universities, providers or > (unix)usergroups?). >
I think that might work, the deps image is a base image and it doesn't change so often. > BUT: As QGIS is getting bigger and bigger, we have to find solutions for this > kind of 'size'-issues when using 'free' services. Same with for example the > use of OSM-tiles or Nominatim-service, Transifex etc etc... We have to be > either creative/clever, OR setup our own stuff... > > Regards, > > Richard Duivenvoorde > Yeah, let's just hope GitHub will remain free or we will have bigger problems ;) In the meantime I can fill up the form https://www.docker.com/community/open-source/application if noone has already done that. -- Alessandro Pasotti QCooperative: www.qcooperative.net ItOpen: www.itopen.it _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
