On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 19:16, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Thank you Nyall for raising these questions - and Greg for joining the > discussion. > > Obviously, the questions are not easy and straight-foward to answer. They > also depend on what the other OS projects will do about this situation in > general. > > Perhaps we can also ask the KDAB folks what they think about this situation > and if they would recommend to continuously work on extending the life span > of qt5x. > > I can mainly comment on the financial aspects: if, after thorough discussion, > we think that staying longer with qt5 is the way the project should follow, > we can of course continue to invest a bit upstream to fix issues through > KDAB. However, the risk is now higher with potential forks and disconnects > from the official qt.
Just to clarify -- I'd make sure we require that all fixes land in qt6 first, to ensure that the work isn't a dead-end. Nyall _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
