Hi all,

Tomorrow is our next PSC meeting. We can discuss it there and then announce
it somewhere where it is hopefully visible (feed and or blog) - along with
the information that QGIS 4.0 is postponed to 2026.

I am also +1 to make 3.44 an LTR as the last 3.x version.

Andreas

On Mon, 8 Sept 2025 at 04:15, Mathieu Pellerin via QGIS-Developer <
qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> +1, makes a lot of sense Denis.
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 7:41 AM Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC <
> qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 23:21, Denis Rouzaud via QGIS-PSC
>> <qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > After the discussion of skipping one release before 4.0, I would like
>> to suggest to turn 3.44 into a LTR version:
>> > - this would lower the pressure on the upcoming 4.0
>> > - this would make a last 3.x version with all the features a LTR
>> > - this would avoid the complexity of maintenance over such a long
>> period of time on 3.40 (in case 4.0 gets more delayed)
>> >
>> > No big deal, but I believe this would make things a bit smoother.
>>
>> Personally, I'm +1 to this.
>>
>> Nyall
>>
>> >
>> > Denis
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > QGIS-PSC mailing list
>> > qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org
>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>> _______________________________________________
>> QGIS-PSC mailing list
>> qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>


-- 

--
Andreas Neumann
QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
_______________________________________________
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to