If it helps, I have been compiling the master branch regularly for sometime using numpy > 2 (currently 2.3.3, with python 3.13.7 on openSUSE Tumbleweed) without any apparent issue or malfunction that I have been aware of. I am not an expert on these matters though, and there may be issues that have escaped my attention.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 1:54 PM Greg Troxel via QGIS-Developer < qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Fredrik Lindberg via QGIS-Developer <qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org> > writes: > > > Are there any plans to implement numpy v2 in any near future as 1.26 > > is becoming rather old at this stage? > > Can you summarize what you found out when reading the build > documentation about whether the qgis master branch can be built against > numpy2, and what happened when you tried to build against it? > > From numpy's release dates it looks like it is only roughly a year since > it has been reasonable to use numpy in production. It's an interesting > question how the numpy-using community views it, in terms of which is > the first 2.x to be safe to use in production. > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
