Hi,
> Is anyone else annoyed by the number of (very clearly wrong) false positives > that the bugprone-branch-clone lint check is giving on CI? Yes, I was close to disable it recently. I searched a little bit to better understand what was going on and my conclusion is that there are several issues since clang 19 (missing includes are one, but it doesn't behave well with some Qt type, like if we replace a QVector with a std::vector, the issue suddenly disappear). So, I'm in favor of removing it. Regards, Julien > Hi list, > > Is anyone else annoyed by the number of (very clearly wrong) false positives > that the bugprone-branch-clone lint check is giving on CI? > > Is there ANY value in this particular check? Or should we just disable it? It > seems completely broken to me[1]. > > Nyall > > [1] I searched upstream for bug reports and can't find anyone else having > this issue. The closest I can find is possibly > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67662 > > _______________________________________________ > QGIS-Developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Julien Cabieces Senior Developer at Oslandia [email protected] _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
