Werner Macho wrote:
Thx for your answers!
But .. I assume a delivered projection file as correct - and you did not
say that government fails or the projection is wrong ..
The provided .prj from you are really nice - but i guess in fact it does
not solve the problem.
I just wanted to know where the problem is to investigate it..
Are the .prj files wrong?
does gdal/ogr something strange?
is qgis acting wrong?
so wheres the real problem behind this all?
From my experience, ESRI/ArcGIS produces not really wrong, but
incomplete .prj-Files in regard to the "towgs84" - Parameter. I solved
the problem using the suitable .prj-file I sent with the last e-mail in
renaming it according to the shape file in question or copying the part
to the ESRI-generated .prj-file.
HTH!
Albin
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Albin Blaschka, Mag. rer.nat - Salzburg, Austria
| http://www.albinblaschka.info http://www.thinkanimal.info
| It's hard to live in the mountains, hard, but not hopeless!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
