Hi!
You mean there's no rely to any .prj file i'll get anywhere?
I mean - I understand that I should controll in every step i do if the
results are ok or not .. but .. at least I thought (beside of
controlling afterwards) that a projection should at least be recognised
at what it is..
And that seems not to be the case allthough it is definitely an EPSG
31259 ..
So which program has a wrong database or where does this translation
failure happen?
regards
Werner
Helmut Kudrnovsky schrieb:
hi Roland,
ArcGIS 9.3 doesn't include the towgs-paramater in the prj-file.
maybe the original definition of a prj-file doesn't include the towgs-parameter, but gdal/ogr needs this information for a correct gdal-warp.
I know from the ESRI-side that you have to define this parameter manually for a
correct on-the-fly-reprojection, the same for GRASS, because there are not
unique towgs-parameter in the epsg-db. it depends from the purpose of the data.
best regards
Helli
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
