Hi,
On Thu, 14 May 2009 13:19:23 +0200
Werner Macho <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> corrected it - if you find more typos - please report ..
>
> Speaking from Unstable and Stable .. well probably we should seperate it
> - but
> Source Code IS already on an own page ..
>
> I guess it's inside the table to have all things we provide for download
> in just one page..
>
> And of course it will mean more work to administrate decent pages for
> stable unstable and source
>
> What do others mean on this topic?
I am also in favor of dividing the binaries into two pages to make clear that we
provide stable and unstable packages and the source code should stay on the
already existing source code page. It may look like this:
# Download
* Stable Software
* Unstable Software
* Source Code
* Plugins
* Sample Data
Tim, I can try to help if you like.
regards,
Otto
> regards
> Werner
> > A couple of comments on
> > http://www.qgis.org/en/download/binaries.html
> >
> > I think that the entry
> > 1.1.0 Stable Ubuntu
> >
> > should be
> > 1.1.0 Unstable Ubuntu
> >
> > as it actually points to:
> > https://launchpad.net/~qgis/+archive/unstable
> > which title is:
> > qgis-unstable
> >
> > Also, I think that stable and unstable versions should be in different
> > pages. Source code (which is not a "Ready-to-Run software packages" as
> > the title of the page states) should also be in a different page.
> >
> > This would make things more clear to users.
> >
> > Thanks to those who made the page!
> >
> > Agus
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Qgis-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
