Well, I assume that the two plugins I posted will remain in the wild as they are designed from a tester's point of view and from an educational point of view.
I would say that plugins that are general enough to benifit ,majority of QGIS users make it to the core. For the other SPECIALIZED plugins a group to review them might be a good idea. I imagine that most of this would depend on the community, for prolific authors might hold more weight than the one times and the learners. A process that merely checks off criteria versus worthiness might make a lot of sense. Making the process objective instead of subjective. Just some thoughts. Cheers > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alex Mandel > Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 22:07 > To: Borys Jurgiel > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Public Repository for plugins... > > Borys Jurgiel wrote: > > Monday 08 of June 2009 22:42:34 Dane Springmeyer napisał(a): > > > >> Funny - how is it that there are only two 'official plugins'? > > > > Yes - nobody is keen to form a High Committee and evaluate > plugins... > > :( > > I don't think too many people have asked, besides that it > seems that plugins that are really good end up in the core > code most of the time and don't exist as separate plugins for long. > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user > _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
