-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi!
I also fully agree - we should bring out 1.2 soon and probably drop 1.0. But the (most asked) thing is that we should have a fully working stand alone installer for windows. Not that I like Windows (I only _have_ to use it @work) but it is still a fact that most people unfortunately are just able to click "Setup.exe" Dont' get me wrong - I like those people .. They are our Users ;) (and they give me work by cleaning their Computer) So I still vote for getting 1.2 out soon but .. to get really more users to use it - we need Setup.exe ;) regards Werner Paolo Cavallini wrote: > Andreas Neumann ha scritto: > >> One of the big advantages QGIS currently has, is that I (as a >> user/customer) can get in new features relatively quickly (compared to >> commercial GIS). QGIS should use this advantage and release often. > > Agreed fully. I think we cannot trust download stats at all, as many > (most?) people download qgis from OSGeo or their distro sites. > Furthermore, the prominent notice on our web site "1.0.2 is the only > good one" pushes hard downloaders towards that version. > Incidentally, I must say that having people using 1.0.2 makes also > people reporting old bugs as new ones, which makes keeping the bug queue > clean more difficult. > I repeat mysel, but I think that deprecating 1.0.2 and releasing 1.2 now > is the way to go. Please note that we only have 9 critical bugs open > now, the lowest number since ages. > All the best. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkphr/wACgkQDAH1YiCxBglNsACeMZ2N/jpSSi5swfgcdn2JiGkp Cn4An3jd/0IfQffFO+XjlXF+gtZRHlAH =zIz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Qgis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
