I see, we are in the same boat then ... with all advantages and risks
resulting from the trunk.
I think that is fine as long as you clearly state to your course
participants that the trunk is the development build and can sometimes
result in unexpected surprises. I guess that after 1.4 stable that QGIS
is mature enough for daily use without having to rely on trunk ..
Cheers,
Andreas
Giovanni Manghi wrote:
Hi Andreas,
your are good points obviously. I know that is a little risky, but from
my point of view it was almost a forced choice. First the trunk has too
m.any new neat features that would be a shame not showing them, and
second the 1.3 version has a few nasty bugs. In particular I remember
one in vector symbology (qgis crashes). I can live with occasional
crashes and problems in brand new features (and I guess/hope that our
course attendees do understand it) but I cannot show a program that
crashes while doing a simple symbology operation. Until now users are
pretty impressed with the trunk version and common thing they say is
that they didn't imagined that was possibile to do that much with Qgis.
Cheers!
-- Giovanni --
_______________________________________________
Qgis-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
